Well, we have our Final Four in college basketball. We got to this point by holding an annual 64 team tournament....a playoff, if you will. It wasn't created by a computer system based on quality wins and losses and strength of schedule. Yet why do I feel like last years college football season got it more right than this years college basketball Final Four?
At the end of the college football season, there are probably five teams that could all argue they had "the best year." The BCS system at least gives us arguably two of those top five teams in the national championship game. That's guaranteed every year. Sure, we may not be happy with the final two in the title game, but it's usually not too far off (like last season: we got Texas vs. Alabama).
When the regular college basketball season ended, if you were asked, "who are the best four teams in college basketball right now?" - how would you answer? Kansas, Kentucky, Syracuse, Ohio State? You might throw in a team like Kansas State. What's the Final Four this year? Butler, Michigan State, West Virginia and Duke. Satisfied?
I know it's semantics, but one system gives us a "tournament champion" and the other system give us "the best team that season." If Duke basketball wins this tournament, they will have accomplished it by defeating: Arkansas-Pine Bluff, California, Purdue, Baylor, West Virginia and either Michigan State or Butler. Remember that list of the best teams this season in college basketball (Kansas, Kentucky, Syracuse, Ohio State)? Duke didn't have to play any of those teams. Now, I understand, that's not Duke's fault and if those teams were really "the best", why didn't they get in the way of Duke's path? But my point is, we aren't guaranteed anything with the March Madness tournament. We aren't guaranteed that the top teams will meet in a 4 team playoff. In college football we are closer.
So next Monday night one team will be cutting down the nets. It could be Butler. What it won't be is "the best team in America."